| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
181. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Simple fact here is most people in highsec have no reason to go to low sec because highsec gives them better rewards for near zero effort and risk. This is what is hurting the game as a whole. Moving highsec ice to lowsec, shakin...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.14 10:47:22
|
182. If CODE owns highsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doris Laur wrote: Bing Bangboom wrote: Once again, witness the power of a New Order Agent to get a rebel miner to confess their lies.... I did not lie. And now you have made two mistakes. So much for your power. Of course you lied. You...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.14 08:42:27
|
183. Suspect Timer (lvl2) for better interaction, pvp&fun - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Isn't this a little redundant? Criminals, that is outlaws, are already permanently free-to-shoot, and players who gank regularly accumulate killrights which are often set public and free or offered for next to nothing. You can already shoot the ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.13 16:36:03
|
184. If CODE owns highsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: As evidenced by zkillboard I would suggest that CODE rarely passes on the pod. I really don't care what CODE does - just don't try to make it out as though you're providing a public service. If you were, you'd go around he...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.12 18:29:36
|
185. If CODE owns highsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Why do you think they don't anymore? But more importantly, isn't going after the lowest of the low hanging fruit, the laziest of lazy, and the most egregiously bad play still important? I mean, I thi...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.12 17:45:37
|
186. If CODE owns highsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: I will give them props for coming up with their own special brand of kool-aid and then consuming it en masse. They were more beneficial to EVE when they were going after bots and AFK players, however. Why do you think th...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.12 16:19:40
|
187. Suicide Gankers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sally Clay wrote: Quote: To fix your sec status how much ISK does it cost? u already know it don't be silly lol 4x trainer > 5.6kk 6x recruiter > 12kk 6x trans > 110kk 4x nego > 80kk ----------- 210 kk and voil+á ur ss is oki...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.12 12:44:59
|
188. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hakawai wrote: I don't think any of the opinions or suggestions you're claiming the other poster presented are accurately stated in your post. You've certainly taken a lot of what he said and "spun" it into something ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.11 11:59:28
|
189. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Dropping the dec is still 100% voluntary. That doesn't give me the means to actually attack their capacity to make war , as with every other mechanic which first exposes something to risk before it bestows a benefit. The...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.11 07:04:52
|
190. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hakawai wrote: Given that assumed objective, the behaviors listed above lead to a bad outcome: beginners finding that the game (perhaps inadvertently) ,contains a mechanism (wardeccing in highsec) that is significantly biased against new player...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.10 11:34:48
|
191. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Eve only works when we are all vulnerable to each other. I couldn't agree more. That is exactly the reason why wardecs are loopy. Everything else in the game works on a paradigm of increasing risk o...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.09 20:01:41
|
192. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Currently, player Citadel/EC can already change taxes/rates to 0. It hasnt made any significant dent in the flood towards Jita. Even though they proliferate in huge amounts throughout HS, its had almost zero effect on Ji...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.09 15:58:16
|
193. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hakawai wrote: This "complete game security" claim is a "straw man", and in it's own way as much of a passive/aggressive stealth insult as that EVE fun-vampire favorite "perhaps this isn't the right game for you". Is it? If CCP is clear abou...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.09 09:23:01
|
194. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Black Pedro wrote: They are the fundamental mechanism by which PvP is done in highsec.. Black Pedro. You are better than this. WarDecs may be among the loudest and most well documented form of PvP in HiSec thanks to ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.09 07:41:39
|
195. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: ...but there's no way to take the wardec from you, or win the war, or actually force a commitment to staying on grid. Unlike every other content seed, one cannot deny you the ability to put up decs, and if I do choose to mu...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.08 20:58:02
|
196. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: So again we have one group that simply does not want to fight. Ever. The other group that isn't interested in going out of their way for a fight, and especially against an entity that will put up a robust response (heck go do...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.08 08:59:36
|
197. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Red Frog Freight dances around the mechanics and is little impacted by wars. It would be really cool to actually have shipping wars. Red Frog actually has enough stakes on the table to probably be ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.08 08:05:13
|
198. Fixing Highsec Wardec Player Retention Issues - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maldiro Selkurk wrote: Old Pervert wrote: I'm more of the opinion that there's a better solution. Consider this. The high sec deccers declare on some high sec corp. High sec corp hires mercs. High sec corp then flies a brick tanked someth...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.08 06:44:38
|
199. Fixing Highsec Wardec Player Retention Issues - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dark Lord Trump wrote: I would support a corporation or wardec rule that allows you to make wardec-proof corporations, but also prevents them from anchoring structures, and perhaps adds an additional NPC tax to their activities. Allow people to...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.07 16:03:39
|
200. NPC Hi Sec Blue Community - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Scipio: Your character does nothing without you. Its a lifeless puppet in virtual space. You are what decides the actions of your puppet. How you choose to dis/associate with that puppet, is up to you. But the puppet onl...
- by Black Pedro - at 2017.03.07 11:13:31
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |